The applying of social innovation in healthcare: a scoping assessment | Infectious Ailments of Poverty

Overview of research included

A complete of 27 research met the eligibility standards and have been included within the scoping assessment (Fig. 3). Nearly all of articles (21/27) have been printed between 2015 and 2020. Half (14/27) have been printed in health-specific journals and the remaining half in a variety of different disciplines together with administration and enterprise research and programme, coverage and planning research, innovation and informatics, and agriculture. The commonest strategies have been case research (14/27), and scoping, systematic and common literature evaluations (4/27). The literature was dominated by analysis originating from high-income nation contexts, notably in Europe. 9 printed research have been carried out in low-income, low-middle earnings or upper-middle nations (two in Africa; 4 in Asia; three in Latin America). Low-income nation researchers (first writer) and establishments have been under-represented within the pattern, restricted to solely three representing establishments in Colombia, Uganda and India.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Literature search and assessment course of


Social innovation has been utilized to a wide range of illness focus areas and to satisfy public well being coverage aims (Desk 2). Social improvements in low- and middle-income nations (LMICs), 3/27 research, centered on infectious ailments, focusing on prevention and entry to providers for malaria, HIV and Chagas illness [61,62,63,64]. A second focus of social improvements in LMICs, 9/27 research, was to realize fairness in entry to care and this included ladies’s well being points and social determinants of well being akin to poverty, rurality, and infrastructure (fundamental sanitation) [61, 64, 65]. These focus areas have been in step with each nationwide well being agendas in addition to international agendas as set by the Millennium and Sustainable Improvement Targets. The literature from high-income nations describes a unique software of social innovation when it comes to illness focus and public well being aims. Many European nations have adopted social innovation to handle welfare state failures, notably associated to the shortcoming of governments to maintain rising well being expenditures for ageing populations [66,67,68,69,70,71,72]. On this context, social improvements have additionally been developed in response to coverage aims regarding public participation in well being, typically as a secondary technique to maneuver the burden of care from the state to people and different actors via social enterprise [71, 73,74,75]. As this means, social innovation is usually utilized to handle well being system failures. Kreitzer et al. [76], for instance, explored the Buurtzorg (Neighbourhood Care) Mannequin within the Netherlands, designed to beat vertical service supply, low well being employee satisfaction, and burdensome bureaucratic processes of care. De Freitas et al. [73] presents a participatory course of involving households of sufferers affected by congenital issues within the design interventions in areas the place well being programs responsiveness is poor, and Windrum et al. [77] presents the case of making a standardised diabetes prevention and administration programme based mostly on patient-centred rules. This programme led to the reform of care provision throughout a number of nations.

Desk 2 Social innovation problem focus

Kind and performance

The classification of social improvements was problematic due to their divergent operational definitions. Two articles supplied a proposed typology for social improvements in well being. Mason et al. [66] proposed 4 kinds of social improvements in well being fairness: as social actions; providers; social enterprises; and digital merchandise. Farmer et al. [74] proposed a typology developed by frontline suppliers to advertise little one dental well being as: extending current practices; creating cheaper variations of current merchandise; adapting current practices in numerous contexts or observe areas; and translating concepts immediately from proof. From these circumstances research of particular social improvements, nevertheless, the proposed typologies proved too slender or restrictive as classification constructions. The case research fell into two useful classes, with social innovation handled both as a course of or an final result.

4 research centered on social innovation as a course of. These research employed participatory mechanisms to help the event of recent options to native challenges. The purpose in all circumstances was to boost affected person or public participation in well being care and improve social relationships. Collaborative workshops occurred within the type of design sprints, co-design processes and suppose tank methodologies [73, 74, 81]. All these workshops have been led by skilled facilitators who have been described as being ‘bricoleurs’, offering inspiration to contributors, defending the improvements, and linking them to sources. Srinivas [63], for instance, offered a case that used crowdsourcing contests to offer males who’ve intercourse with males the chance to design well being promotional materials to encourage different males to check for HIV.

The place social improvements have been described as an final result, fashions included totally different parts (providers, merchandise, processes, social actions) and supply in numerous settings. Neither single element of the mannequin was notably distinctive, however the mixture or ‘bricolage’ of those parts resulted in innovation. Three kinds of fashions have been recognized: care fashions (6/27 research); social community/connection fashions (3/27 research); and entrepreneurial fashions (2/27 research) (Desk 3). These fashions might or might not have a digital element or a monetary element. Innovation in care fashions concerned the re-organisation of care processes, together with how providers have been delivered, typically transferring facility-based providers immediately into the group, with the position and scope of suppliers modified to offer extra autonomy or permit for task-shifting to non-health professionals [63, 70, 76, 77, 80, 86]. These care fashions reported optimistic outcomes on extending entry to well being providers, enhancing affordability and bettering effectiveness on illness or wellbeing indicators. The progressive facet of social community fashions have been the connections and relationships fostered between totally different actors and sectors [79, 84, 87]. Digital merchandise akin to cellular apps or on-line web sites have been leveraged to facilitate connections between actors. The outcomes of those fashions included optimistic behavioural change, constructing group social capital, and enhancing ladies’s participation and roles. The innovation inside the entrepreneurial fashions have been mechanisms to scale back prices of providers [72, 82], whereas additionally bettering entry to providers and creating new employment alternatives.

Desk 3 Social innovation as an final result


Within the literature, creators of social innovation can function both as people or as collectives, the latter together with citizen actions, cross-disciplinary collaborative actor groups and establishments. The traits of particular person social innovators in well being will not be effectively described, however three case research provide perception into the position of private expertise, hardship or problem, or of a group taking part in a major contribution within the innovator’s work. Among the many indigenous Maori inhabitants of New Zealand, improvements can typically be constrained by tradition and place, particularly when diverted from acceptable mainstream western approaches [80]. Nevertheless, social innovators in well being used cultural, social and place-based capital to create options to serve their very own communities [65, 80, 86]. In every case, group belief within the innovation was essential to its success.

The collective creation of social innovation in well being (8/27 research), both in cross-disciplinary actor groups or networks, has acquired larger consideration. Firstly, the social innovation improvement course of is used to beat the siloed nature of well being and to foster larger interdisciplinarity and intersectionality [61, 62, 66, 67, 69, 81, 82, 87]. That is notably effectively illustrated in relation to Chagas illness in Guatemala, the place innovation in interventions concerned collaboration from epidemiology, biology, anthropology, sociology, engineering and structure, and numerous funding companies, worldwide non-governmental organisations, authorities and universities [61]. The good thing about groups and collective networks is their capability to maneuver past boundaries and draw on collective cognition, capital, and the pooling and complementarity of capabilities [67].

Inside these groups, alternative was created for the participation of non-expert actors. As described in these articles [61, 74, 81], the worth of social innovation from a public well being coverage perspective is the chance it affords much less highly effective actors (sufferers, households, beneficiaries, group members) to contribute to new well being options, drawing on experiential data and private data that may meaningfully contribute to and complement knowledgeable or educational data. Making use of social innovation as a course of in itself results in new types of energy relations and empowerment. The participation of actors in resolution creation in some circumstances has translated into group motion, however little past anecdotal proof is offered within the well being literature of sustained intervention success or actor empowerment [61, 73, 74]. Case research from the administration and improvement literature (3/27 research) present extra depth and longitudinal proof to substantiate the extent to which communities might be empowered, making certain that self-governance and group autonomy of initiatives are achieved. The Kerala Palliative Care mannequin, for instance, has scaled far past its preliminary locus of implementation. From 1995 to 2012, 230 group organisations and 26 000 social activists grew to become concerned within the supply of home-based providers to 70 000 sufferers on the finish of life [86]. The Graham Vikas social innovation in India additionally illustrates that the core to its method is 100% inclusion of members of the group, notably ladies’s involvement in all decision-making processes. As a place to begin, this system established a consultant committee in every village, and a sustainability fund into which group members contributed, in accordance with their means, to co-fund the work. All through challenge implementation, coaching was delivered on management, accounting and different operational procedures to make sure the group can totally handle the initiative independently [65]. One other instance, the Enterprise-in-a-Field initiative in Pakistan, illustrates how adopting a micro-entrepreneurship method to extending entry to contraception can empower ladies to change into self-employed earnings mills whereas assembly their well being wants [82].

Along with embedding social improvements immediately into communities, institutionalised actor networks can work to make sure sustainability. One mannequin which has efficiently embedded an initiative throughout a number of institutional ranges is the Therapeutic Affected person Training Mannequin for Diabetes [77] in Austria. This case demonstrates the significance of social improvements partaking in institutional and political work with current skilled our bodies at native and worldwide ranges, whereas creating new skilled our bodies to help its translation from analysis, its diffusion and its sustainability.

In abstract, no class of actor is excluded from social innovation, regardless of his/her background, organisational affiliation or hierarchical stage. Throughout the literature, social innovation is seen as a democratising catalyst for well being, enabling broad-based sectoral motion, inclusion of marginalised people (together with ladies) and offering communities with alternatives for motion.


To look at the rules and values upon which social improvements are based mostly, articles have been sub-classified in accordance with the social innovation paradigm to which they ascribed. As illustrated above (Fig. 1), three important paradigms, nested inside one another, exist: the instrumental or technocratic paradigm that accounts for social inclusion within the creation of recent options; the democratic paradigm that accounts for the empowerment of actors via social innovation; and the institutional or structural paradigm that accounts for adjustments inside current establishments and programs. Nearly all of articles (16/27) upheld the instrumental or technocratic paradigm through which context social innovation was considered an answer to handle challenges, and occurred via participatory processes that promoted the social inclusion of various actors. Though encouraging engagement in social innovation, this paradigm doesn’t differ vastly from different approaches to public or affected person participation and participatory governance in public well being and improvement. These options provide improved methods to make sure larger effectiveness or effectivity, however don’t remodel relations or constructions. These articles originate primarily from Europe, the place the method to social innovation has been influenced by the European Fee’s inclusion of the precept into coverage with neoliberal agendas [45].

A second however smaller variety of articles (8/27) have interaction with empowerment. These transcend giving actors a voice or alternative to offer enter via session, and supply them with the chance to take management. By constructing the capability of marginalised or under-represented actors, they develop an enhanced stage of company and motion which suggests a change in energy relations taking impact. Many larger-scale social innovation care fashions had people-centredness as a core organising precept [76, 80, 82]. Fashions have been designed to contain not solely the affected person or the beneficiary on the well being centre, but additionally well being staff. The Buurtzog Neighbourhood Care mannequin, for instance, illustrated how, by enhancing affected person and supplier (nurse) autonomy, higher outcomes in care provision have been achieved and supplier motivation and satisfaction have been enhanced [76]. The iMOKO (New Zealand) and Enterprise-in-a-Field (Pakistan) circumstances each illustrate empowerment of the area people by putting entry to healthcare within the fingers of trusted group members akin to academics, and by giving ladies in the neighborhood alternatives for earnings technology [80, 82]. The Time Financial institution mannequin ascribed dignity and value to the life of every particular person, and this highlighted the worth of group members as energetic contributors in healthcare: “The primary core worth of the Time Financial institution operations is asset, one thing of worth to share with another person … nobody is nugatory on the earth … everyone seems to be a contributor to society in his or her personal means” [84]. Social improvements present how trusted group members akin to academics can play an important position in selling well being and entry to providers; how ladies can play a task within the supply of well being merchandise whereas being lifted from poverty via earnings producing alternatives; and the way aged individuals might be each customers and suppliers of providers [61, 62, 76, 80, 82, 84, 87].

The third and smallest variety of articles (4/27) ascribed and recognised the systemic or structural paradigm of social innovation, and within the analysis, assessed the adjustments and dynamics that occurred at an institutional stage. The analysis carried out by Vijay and Monin [86] in India adopted an institutional perspective to look at how sure contexts are extra ‘poised’—receptive and prepared—for social improvements. Additionally they examined how actors, working as institutional entrepreneurs, exercised company to play an necessary position to extend the readiness of particular context to innovation and overcome the perceived resistance of current establishments and constructions. The Kerala Palliative Care mannequin demonstrated giant scale institutional change because it reframed palliative care provision from a medical body to a social justice body, with an expert hospice or hospital mannequin changed by the bottom-up organisation of providers delivered primarily by group volunteers. The Therapeutic Affected person Training Mannequin for Diabetes revealed that, on the core of this initiative, programs stage change was achieved by the institutional work of actors from nationwide skilled associations. They labored to embed the mannequin into current establishments (e.g. medical insurance funds), whereas they created new establishments (new skilled our bodies) to make sure that new norms, values and practices have been embedded at a programs stage. Windrum et al. [77] recognised the potential of a mannequin of affected person centred care as having the potential of democratising drugs.

Lastly, analysis carried out by Pless and Appel [65] illustrated how social improvements can remodel the norms, values, perceptions and roles inside social establishments at group stage via a number of approaches: the entire inclusion of all group members; the institution of self-governing group constructions; the availability of abilities constructing; and repair supply. The challenge positioned group members within the position of shoppers, in order that challenge employees solely acted upon group request. The long-term dedication (> 20 years) of this social innovation ensured that the result of an equitable and social society was achievable. This innovation recognised well being as an final result of sustainable improvement.

Facilitators and limitations

As a closing a part of the framework evaluation, the facilitators and limitations of social improvements have been thought-about which are related at totally different phases of the social innovation life cycle (Desk 4). There have been a number of commonalities throughout the literature when it comes to enablers for thought improvement and implementation together with: making a secure, protecting and facilitated setting; the democratic sharing of data; the significance of timing and context; and implementing self-governance constructions to help ongoing implementation and sustainability. Transferring past the innovation locus to have interaction extra broadly with companions and the prevailing system influenced innovation switch, diffusion and scale. Solely two research—Therapeutic Affected person Training Mannequin and the Kerala Neighborhood Palliative Care mannequin—described the method of institutionalising a social innovation [77, 86]. In each circumstances, a transparent strategic method was adopted by the innovators and implementers to interchange prior institutional logics with new logics. This entailed deep contextual consciousness and engagement in numerous types of institutional work: advocacy to help motion constructing; finding the problem in an ethical or social justice body; partaking current establishments and creating new ones; and investing within the schooling of these concerned within the innovation, each to realize legitimacy and be sure that requirements might be maintained. Each of those social improvements have confirmed sustainable, and as fashions, they’ve been scaled to totally different settings and nations (Austria and India). Obstacles negatively affecting throughout the varied phases of social innovation improvement included price concerns and useful resource constraints, a unreceptive or altering political context, restricted proof of effectiveness and implementer attitudes when it comes to low motivation and drive.

Desk 4 Enablers and limitations

Supply hyperlink